Mega Sale Domains @ Rs.99

Saturday, May 7, 2011

Narendra Modi and ‘Perfidious Media Goebbels’.

Narendra Modi and ‘Perfidious Media Goebbels’.

Perfidious Media’ v/s Narrender Modi

Perfidious Media’ v/s Narrender Modi

Hate Modi is an industry and many have benefited from it (except State Congress). MSM Maharathis have earned selves ‘Padam Shris’ from Sonia ‘Maino’ Gandhi for defaming NaMo and for spreading lies.Some NGOs made a carrer out of it. But then truth has a habbit of surfacing and here too it surfaces, once again. Need we trust ‘Perfidious Media’ again?

Narendra Modi’s open letter to the nation about SIT’s summons to him and NaMo’s alleged non compliance as ‘propagated‘ by ‘Perfidious Media’.

Full text of letter is as follow.

My beloved countrymen,

Namaskar,

I am constrained to write to you with a deep sense of anguish. Since last eight years, canards have been spread against me. For the past one week, if we analyse the allegations leveled against me, then the truth will become evident. Truth cannot be suppressed. It is now my duty to place before you the facts that brings out the importance of understanding what the truth really is.

After the 2002 Godhra incidents, I had categorically said in the Vidhan Sabha and in public that no one is above the Indian Constitution and the law, even if he happens to be the chief minister of a state. These are not mere words. My actions have reflected this statement in its true spirit. I assure you that this will be my stand in the future.

In spite of that, some vested interests, without losing a single opportunity and with malicious pleasure and without bothering to ascertain the truth based on mere whims and fancies, have been tarnishing the good image of Gujarat, my government and me.

Recently, there has been a systematic campaign to defame Gujarat through propagation of false reports titled ‘Special Investigation Team (SIT) summons Narendra Modi’; ‘Narendra Modi did not appear before SIT’ and ‘Modi has shown disrespect to Supreme Court and SIT’. Such baseless allegations are being leveled once again against me to defame Gujarat.

I am therefore compelled to place the facts before my countrymen.

FACTS:

As soon as newspapers began reporting that Modi has been summoned by the SIT, the government spokesperson immediately said that Shri Modi is bound by the law of the land and the Indian Constitution. He has always extended his cooperation to every procedure of law. And he is committed to do so in the future.

It is a matter of grave concern and needs investigation as to why and who started spreading lies that ‘SIT summons Narendra Modi on March 21, 2010′.

The purveyors of untruth failed even to think that March 21, 2010 happens to be a Sunday and a public holiday.

These purveyors of lies even did not once bother to check whether the key SIT officers, who are appointed by the Supreme Court, were present in Gujarat on March 21, 2010.

SIT had not fixed March 21, 2010 for my appearance. To say that I was summoned on March 21 is completely false. I shall respond to the SIT fully respecting the law and keeping in view the dignity of a body appointed by the Supreme Court.

The date of 21st March 2010 was invented by some vested interest and as a part of their effort to interfere in the due process of law. They wanted to paint me as a person who refused to respond to the SIT. This country has in the last twenty four hours witnessed a campaign of disinformation in which a section of the media became an instrument of the disinformers. I hope this section will now take corrective steps.

My beloved countrymen,

The people of Gujarat and this country have identified those who are defaming Gujarat continuously since 2002. But I want to tell the truth; spreading falsehoods has only one single purpose and that is to instigate people. It is a sinful action which will harm the working of a democratic state. Seen in the backdrop of events in the last 24 hours, it shows that there is a nexus among the vested interests in spreading lies against me, in order to defame me. This machination has come unstuck and the people have seen through this charade.

The government of Gujarat has always honoured and cooperated with the investigative agencies, commissions and Supreme Court looking into Godhra and post-Godhra incidents. And that is why I never thought of giving a public statement on this issue.

Despite unbearable pain, I decided to maintain silence in the belief that the due process of law would take its own course.

But now, as the lies reach a crescendo as never before, I am compelled to bring the facts before the countrymen. I also consider it my humble duty.

I hope the truth is not twisted by the purveyors of untruth to misguide the investigation. And I expect that the media would bring my deep pain and despair to the notice of the people.

Mumbai votes for Narendra Modi as national leader

Mumbai votes for Narendra Modi as national leader

Narendra Modi

Narendra Modi

An opinion poll published this morning by Mumbai’s DNA daily newspaper shows a majority of respondents in the city favouring Narendra Modi, the controversial Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) chief minister of Gujarat, as most likely “to provide the kind of leadership required to bring about real change” following last week’s terror attacks in the city. (To find the DNA survey report - see pic below – click here and search Archive for Dec 5)

Nationally Sonia Gandhi, the leader of the Congress Party and of the governing coalition, came out tops with 23% of the vote, closely followed by prime minister Manmohan Singh with 22%, L.K.Advani, the BJP’s national leader at 18%, and Modi with just 14%.

But the result was reversed in Mumbai. There Modi led with a dramatic 47% while Advani, Singh, and Gandhi got 10-13% each.

This is significant because it shows the views of the educated middle class of the city that has been hit most often by terror attacks in recent years, culminating in last week’s commando-style invasion of the Taj and Oberoi hotels, a Jewish centre, and other targets.

As I suggested in a post on December 3, there is a demand across the country for new strong leadership. If the current national leaders do not perform, it is quite possible that the country will turn to the BJP in next year’s general election. Many will then want Modi – a powerful orator and capable administrator – to provide a nationalist hard-line lead.

Such a development would of course be opposed across the political spectrum – including by some BJP leaders – because of Modi’s arch Hindu-nationalist leanings and his record over Gujarat’s Godhra massacre six years ago. He would therefore have great difficulty stitching together a coalition with regional parties .

But the Mumbai vote, in an opinion poll conducted for DNA by IMRS Advisory, a market research firm, cannot be ignored. It is a warning to more moderate leaders to change or risk being swept aside.

Narendra Modi Speaks

Narendra Modi Speaks

Narendra Modi, Chief Minister of Gujarat, also writes a blog http://www.narendramodi.com/post/Common-mans-concerns-Price-Rise-and-Internal-Security.aspx#comment.
Today I came across the following post.


Common man's concerns: Price Rise and Internal Security
by Narendra Modi 19. February 2010 12:08
Friends,

Last couple of months have been extremely busy. And hence I could not find enough time to interact with you. First it was my Government's one of the important priorities: `Garib Kalyan Mela' that kept me engaged. And later, my visits to Delhi.

During my visits to Delhi and interactions with the Central Government, I raised two very important aspects of Governance that we as Indians expect them to think and act on: Price Rise and Internal Security. I personally and very strongly feel these two should be on top in any Central Government's priority as it has an impact on a common man's life.

So I thought today I will share my views with you through this blog. You can visit the links below to read the full text of my speech.

http://www.narendramodi.in/speeches_textfile/speeches_textfile_detail/86

http://www.narendramodi.in/speeches_textfile/speeches_textfile_detail/91

And yes as always I will wait for you comments.

Yours

Narendra Modi


While I agree that Food and Security are important topics for discussion, I am of the opinion there are two other topics which are far more important and they are the cause of the topics Mr. Modi has raised.
I have expressed my views to Mr Modi which are given below.


The two most burning issues for India today are Population and Corruption.
The corruption issue is being raised by everybody after Swami Ramdeo took it up in his "Bharat Swabhiman" movement. We are seeing some perceptible results in Bihar where they have passed a law by which they will confiscate the ill-gotten wealth of corrupt government officials and politicians. It surprised me that even politicians have been added for they consider themselves a class apart.
When are you going to pass such a law in Gujarat or do you mean to tell me there is no corruption in Gujarat?
The population issue has been put in hibernation ever since Sanjay Gandhi committed the excess during Emergency.
Why?
Except for Gulam Navi Azad, I have not heard any politician raise this issue.
Swami Ramdeo mentioned it casually once in his programme but has not mentioned it again. I wonder why?
By the year 2020, we will be exceeding China's population.
With one third the area of China we have the same population. Our population density is 329 per Sq Km against China's 136. In the decade 2000 - 2009, while China's population increased 5.5% our population increased 15.2%.By the year 2050, the population of China will increase by 6.4% and become 1,424,161,948. On the other hand, our population will increase by 43.2% and become 1,656,553,632.
How are we going to feed these people?
I remember the year 1966-67 when there was drought and we had to import sub-standard grains to feed our people under the PL-480 plan.
The Green Revolution made all that look like a bad dream and we romped about producing children.
Well the gains which the Green Revolution gave us have been exhausted. Our population has overcome the gains and we are back to square one.
One bad monsoon and we are crying for food.
As per law of averages we have had very good monsoon rain for the last 8 to 10 years so we can expect bad monsoons for another two or three years.
How are we going to feed the burgeoning population?
With so much corruption and thuggery by the political class, I am really worried.
What do you plan to do, Mr. Chief Minister?

2 comments:

Jay Patel said...

Mr. Sharma..

A US President once said, "ask not what your country and do for you, but what you can do for your country."

I feel you are asking Mr. Modi to perform a miracle. Population control is the responsiblity of every Indian. Modiji is a man, not a god. If there is corruption, it is because the people hove allowed it to flurish, voting corrupt leaders to power. I don't know how far a bottle of liquor or a wad of cash goes these days, but it's there, unchecked.

IF these two issues are burning you so much, what have you done about them? You and I have a responsiblity also. We can begin by educating others to vote for the right leaders who want change. We can teach the people how "over population" can be a negative aspect to our well being, and expose those who are corrupt, (including the Indian Media. What do you say you and I join efforts for these? Mr. Modiji is doing his part, and a fine job of it too. Let us do ours also...

I pray everyday for Mr. Modiji, when deep in Meditation. I hope god will keep him strong and safe for all time. I would like the people of India to stand behind Him one day, (and they will, when the time is right) as he the best chance we have.

Jai Hind..

Narendra Modi invokes Mahatma Gandhi

Narendra Modi invokes Mahatma Gandhi

http://nimg.sulekha.com/others/original700/anil-ambani-narendra-modi-2009-1-13-10-35-0.jpg

Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi on Saturday invoked Mahatma Gandhi and said the best way to define good governance was with Gandhiji's talisman. “Do the policies help the poorest and weakest man? If yes, that is good governance.”

He was addressing the Bharatiya Janata Party's inaugural session of the National Convention on Good Governance (Suraj Sankalp) here.

“We need action-based approach like that of Lal Bahadur Shastri or Sardar Patel. Mere talking and symbolic gestures serve no purpose. Has celebrating Children's Day improved the condition of children in this country?”

A copy of his speech was given to the media, as he did not address the convention in front of the press.

“Shun Congress culture”

BJP president Nitin Gadkari urged party members to shun the Congress political culture. “I am pained to hear talks of caste-based hierarchies in our office. Respect should be commanded, not demanded. You don't need to go to Delhi and touch everyone's feet,” he said.

Changing the public perception of the BJP, eliminating the hierarchy-based internal approach and widening the ambit of good governance were the focal points of discussion on the first day of the two-day convention being attended by around 65 delegates from the BJP-ruled States.

Mr. Modi emphasised just and non-discriminatory governance which aimed at the welfare of all. “That is Suraj [good governance]. Pro-active good governance is the need of the hour. Remember, people are willing to pay for quality service.” . His speech was laced with references to thinkers — Kautilya, Lao Tse, Mahatma Gandhi, Pandit Deendayal Upadhyaya, Robert Putnam, Amartya Sen, Alvin Toffler, Osborne and Gaebler. He said the need of the hour was not downsizing, but rightsizing the government.

“Democratic governance is more important than good governance because it empowers people. We already know about good governance because of concepts like Ram Rajya. The question is how to achieve it” He later elaborated on the initiatives taken by the Gujarat government and their effect.

Media's role

While talking about the role of various institutions in creating open and good governance, he said that the media should not only criticise the mistakes of other institutions but also highlight the successful initiatives for others to learn. “Currently we have procedural accountability and not performance accountability. Unfortunately, this encourages people to be indecisive and to avoid responsibility.”

He lamented that the Right to Information Act was more often used by middlemen and vested interests to harass the administration. “The challenge is to maintain transparency without diluting efficiency of the government,” he said.

While taunting those Ministers who keep lecturing about accountability, he said that they should give clear guidelines to the officials and become aware of the department's potential, rather than concentrating only on the limitations.

Advani may attend

Senior leader Lal Krishna Advani may attend the convention on Sunday. According to the party's governance cell chairman, Manohar Parrikar, the convention is aimed at self-evaluation and preparing a road map for the development of BJP-ruled States.

Narendra Modi and Adolf Hitler

Narendra Modi and Adolf Hitler


http://www.thenarendramodi.info/wp-content/themes/thesis_16/custom/rotator/Narendra-Modi-blog.jpg

Narendra Modi and the rise of his party have many similarities with Adolf Hitler and rise of Nazis in Germany. Modi’s victory bodes ill for this nation.

In a state where Mahatma Gandhi was born, we have a leader now who confesses his targeting of Muslims, and yet, people vote him back into power. Hitler used to openly confess his contempt for Jews and yet people backed him. Modi is a bachelor, like Hitler. He is (supposedly) not corrupt (like Hitler). He is vegetarian (like Hitler) and has contempt for meat-eaters. He goes after his agenda which he makes it clear right in the beginning (like Hitler) and it involves targeting certain sections blaming them for all ills of the society. The economic prosperity in the land is high (like under Hitler), and his goons are ready to target and kill one community (like under Hitler) with protection from the state apparatus. Like Hitler, Modi practices and spends lot of time on mastering his oratory. Like Hitler, he creates an image and persona that is much more than the party and the ideology.

Modi is in-your-face candid about his wrongdoings (like Hitler) which people see as a sign of honesty in comparison to other weak and corrupt leaders who push the same agenda but are not honest about it. Congress and Left have no better track record when it comes to protecting the interests of minority religions in this country. Their record is same or even worse compared to that of Mr. Narendra Modi. The difference is that Narendra Modi just accepts what he does. A known, strong and honest criminal is better than a hypocrite, weak and dishonest criminal – that seems to be the attitude of Indian people.

It’s unfortunate that we have come to this. It’s unfortunate that our leaders could not set right examples. The examples of Mahatma Gandhi, Nehru, Ambedkar, Shastri, Patel, Radhakrishnan, etc, are long gone. We are bereft of good examples. When everyone is a criminal, an honest and strong one is most preferred. Hence, Narendra Modi!

Adolf Hitler came to power riding similar sympathies. When accused of bringing a government down, he honestly said, yes, and was even convicted. He did not lie. He did not falter (like what Modi did to Sohrabuddin). That brought him more public support. When Hitler spoke he did not hide his contempt for Jews, and neither did he hide his agenda on how he is going to take care of Jewish Problem. Still, the people of Germany who were surrounded by weak-hearted and corrupt leaders who would collude and make marriages of convenience just to be in power, voted this man to power because they thought he would at least tell them what he does and what he intends to do, honestly.

While some observers of the early twentieth century spelt doom on the rise of Nazis in Germany, many other politicians (in Germany and outside), weak at heart, diffident, and completely involved in their petty politics underestimated the rise of Hitler (read, Congress and the Left). They thought he was a tiny figure who will be swept away very soon. That never happened. They kept giving into his demands. He fed on that support and mass hysteria and became a megalomaniac who plunged the whole world into its greatest war which ended up killing more than 50 million people in less than ten years.

Modi is on the rise in India. It is not a good sign. It bolsters and gives support to other elements that harbor similar thoughts in India. Hindutva forces already talk about emulating and replicating Gujarat in other states of India. People explain his win as a mandate of people. That’s a sorry state of affairs. What if a majority of Indians vote to kill all the minorities in one stroke, will we accept that mandate? Is law of the land and our constitution subservient to people’s mandate? We have a skewed and distorted view of what it means to be a democracy.

Indians have not learned to draw the line between what is acceptable and what is not. Here, in Gujarat, we have blurred those lines. We have legitimized crime that targets certain people based on their identity. The future is bleak. All this economic prosperity is not going to save us. Instead, this prosperity will only fuel such hatred to take it to the next level, where state participates in marginalizing, demonizing and then targeting of certain identities.

Narendra Modi and Adolf Hitler II

Narendra Modi and Adolf Hitler II


http://www.karmicastro.com/narendra_modi.gif

My previous article, Narendra Modi and Adolf Hitler, raised many objections from commenters (at another site where I publish my articles) who did not believe Modi and Hitler were similar. They asked me many questions. Here, I answer some of them.

[But the kind of the debate that ensued actually worried me more. Most of these debates confirm my belief that we are in deeper shit than what I would like to tell myself.]

Is Modi really the next Hitler? Do you really believe it?

Modi may not be Hitler and may be he is far from it. May be, India is not ripe yet for bringing such a leader onto the stage. May be, what he did in 2002 is a one-off incident which he won’t repeat again. That’s the good news.

The bad news is that we are creating the very similar situation that Europe went through during late 1800s and early 1900s. WW-II was the point of culmination of that situation. The exit point for fueling such hatred for another identities and instilling such superiority complex of oneself is a blood bath. The more the pent up sentiments and prolonged the indoctrination the bigger the blood bath.

Many nations who have experienced this gruesome war have gone back to check such sentiments from growing within and have put in place many harsh boundaries, some even sound ridiculous – like the law which prohibits people from denying Holocaust.

India, on the other hand, continues to harbor similar sentiments, not really knowing where it is taking us. India continues to play innocent when small flash points occur, thinking it is all OK. According to me, Indians are myopic, which is clearly seen in all their policies- either it is road building, or nation building. They are being myopic in this context too.

Nearly 93% Indians believe that “our culture is superior to others”, topping the list in a survey conducted in various nations [available at pewglobal.com]. Also, we are very insecure about our greatness. 92% of Indians think that “our way of life needs to be protected against foreign influences.”

In addition to this superiority complex and xenophobia, which we share with pre-WWII Nazi Germany, we also have a pent up hatred for minority religions in India. I wish there was a poll conducted to check the hatred for other religions within the country, and I believe we will top the list in that survey too.

I see a trend which does not bode well for India. In spite of all the prosperity, we are plunging our nation into darkness. It is like entering a long and deep tunnel. We will not know till we reach it. And I believe we are racing towards that tunnel.

Do you think we can avert the calamity that you predict?

Absolutely! There is no reason we need to follow the same pattern as pre-WWII Europe. I wish and hope that we don't follow the same pattern. I believe that we can avert such calamities by setting right examples at every step. For that we need to teach our people the outcomes of our actions.

We had 1984 riots where Sikhs for butchered and massacred. We should have raised our voices and asked for justice. We did not raise our voices. We did not protest. As a majority, we just shrugged it off. We thought it was one of those 'natural reactions'. Sikhs in India lost faith in Indian Union. It fueled and exacerbated Khalistan Movement and thousands were killed.

Now, we have another of those incidents. A government, the state and its apparatus colluded with killers in targeting people of one identity. And yet, we do not raise our voice. We do not protest. Instead, we hail such people as heroes and vote them back to power. Wrong examples!

Such wrong examples lead to wrong results. We will see more Muslims disillusioned and disenchanted. That will lead to more displeasing actions and we continue to go down that spiral path and the only exit is a blood bath. I don't want that to happen in India.

Teaching ourselves history and consequences of our inaction is very important. For that one has to know what could happen when we go on setting wrong examples. We need to teach in our history books what happened after Indira Gandhi's assassination. We need to teach how our leaders who were in power came onto streets to encourage and support the killers that targeted people of one identity. We need to teach how those events spiraled into a big terrorist movement in this land where thousands of young people died.

We need to teach how fascism grew in pre-WWII Europe. How innocuous it seemed to wave one's national flag and salute it brimming with pride. How harmless it sounded to create new theories that proposed how superior the people of that land were. How reasonable it sounded to target one community for all the ills of the society. Yet, all those simple actions were hijacked by certain people who used it to create greatest tragedy of human history.

What will save India?

What will save India is its diversity. While Hindutva forces continue to unify all Hindus under one banner, regional and other distinct groups will continue to prop their own factions. That alone will save India. I encourage and promote such local identities.

I don't see a necessity for unifying Indians under one banner called Hinduism, or one color of nationalism as defined by the highest flag bearers. We want our local identities, our religious identities, our languages. We don't want to trade them for another.

Why did you choose Hitler for comparison? Why not a Mao, Stalin or Osama?

My attempt was not to insult Modi by comparing him with Hitler. The reason why I chose Hitler and not Mao or Stalin is for obvious reasons. The present Hindutva movement sounds closer to the rise of Nazis than the rise of Communists. I have no love for Stalin, Mao or Osama.

The common themes between the present Hindutva movement and the erstwhile rise of Nazis are the following:

1. Establishing superiority of oneself over others - culturally, intellectually, and historically [which is main theme of Nazism, pronounced in pre-WWII Germany and to certain extent in Japan and Italy, but is not the main theme in Communism. The main theme of Communism is the rise of worker class to topple the privileged, but then to go on and establish another privileged class - which is another story.]

2. Creating an enemy based on identity - religious or racial or national [which is again one of the main features of Nazism, but is not the main theme in Communism. The enemies of Communism are within, mostly the rulers or the privileged class, or the intellectuals. They are not necessarily targeting people of one identity. Stalin killed all kinds of people independent of their identity- his own people, his political opponents, critics, Cossacks, Muslims dissidents, and what not.]

3. Following one person who is idolized above the party or its ideology [Hitler above Nazi Party or Germany itself. Communism usually tries to promote the whole party and not necessarily one idol. Even if there is one idol who dominates for a while, it corrects itself to go back to promoting the party.]

The similarities that I cited between Modi and Hitler is not with a motive or an agenda- it's only to put across an observation. Readers are free to introduce a "politically motivated" element to it and dismiss it.