Mega Sale Domains @ Rs.99

Saturday, March 12, 2011

Anti-Adivasi and Anti-Dalit Actions

Anti-Adivasi and Anti-Dalit Actions


http://www.vandeindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Modi_with_Devanand.jpg

Narendra Modi’s actions have also impacted adivasis and dalits, as dams on the river Narmada have forcibly displaced hundreds of thousands across the states of Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Gujarat, without their consent and without provisions for resettlement and rehabilitation. Sardar Sarovar, which Modi cites as Gujarat's majestic achievement, is a gigantic dam expected to displace 200,000 people and negatively impact another 200,000. Modi has used the dam's apparent 'success' to deflect attention from his government's complicity in the events of 2002.[61]

Anti-Christian Violence

Anti-Christian Violence


http://static.indianexpress.com/m-images/2009-08-20/M_Id_101415_Narendra_Modi.jpg

When Keshubhai Patel came to power as the BJP chief minister in 1998, violence against Christians escalated.[57] Between December 25, 1998 and January 03, 1999, in Dangs district, more than 20 churches were destroyed. Angry mobs assailed and robbed Christians, including in their homes. Human Rights Watch noted that the attacks in December and January were "preceded by escalating violence throughout the state in which many police and state officials were implicated."[58]

Although Muslims were the primary targets of violence in 2002, there are reports of Christians being attacked or robbed during the post-Godhra riots. According to a Human Rights Watch, Christians in Gujarat are still under "legislative, administrative, and physical assault" in 2003. Anti-Christian actions range from anti-conversion legislation in the state government, state sponsored surveys of Christians, and threats and physical assaults.[59] Organizations such as Christian Solidarity Worldwide and the All India Christian Council continue to document cases of widespread anti-Christian violence perpetrated by the Sangh.[60]

Ali Case Sentencing

Ali Case Sentencing

http://www.filmyfriday.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/narendr-a-modi-asitkkumarr-modi-and-hansmukh-modi.jpg

On February 23, 2005, an Ahmedabad court sentenced three persons, Varyansinh Bhatia, Manjitsinh Varyansinh and Rajesh Koshti, to four years imprisonment for stabbing Naseembibi Safar Ali, a pregnant woman, to death. The murder took place on February 28, 2002, in the Madhavpura area in the city of Ahmedabad.[56] This case was re-opened for investigation per the directive of the Supreme Court. The Gujarat Court’s decision starkly communicates the lack of value given to the life of Naseembibi Safar Ali, a pregnant Muslim woman. To find the male perpetrators guilty of murder and see fit to punish them with four year sentences makes a mockery of justice and aligns the state, perhaps once again, with the organized violence that was Gujarat in 2002.

Bilkis Case

Bilkis Case


http://uptopics.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/NarendraModi/NarendraModi_218846717.jpg

Bilkis Yakoob Rasool (or Bilkis Bano) of Randhikpur village was gang-raped during the post-Godhra violence. She was five months pregnant at the time of her rape and lost fourteen family members, including her three-year-old child, mother, and two sisters. She was among a group of seventeen persons attacked by village neighbors, some of whom she has known all of her life. Since then, she has been forced to move twenty times due to the threats made against her. On August 06, 2004, the Supreme Court transferred her case from Ahmedabad to Mumbai, based on evidence generated by the Central Bureau of Investigation that as witness she would be in danger if the trial were to proceed in Gujarat.[55] On February 22, 2005, she identified 12 of the perpetrators in in camera proceedings. Eight others, including police officers and medical doctors, are also accused of protecting the guilty.

United States: Narendra Modi and Sangh Parivar Organizations

United States: Narendra Modi and Sangh Parivar Organizations


http://photos-e.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc3/hs048.snc3/13565_179149877668_623847668_2952864_61475_n.jpg

Continuing International Concern

There has been non-partisan support in the United States for human rights in Gujarat. Former President Clinton condemned the events in Gujarat, and Congressman Joseph R. Pitts (R-PA) addressed the United States House of Representatives on June 18, 2002, condemning the premeditated brutality in Gujarat and acknowledging insufficient action on the part of the United States. Pitts also conveyed that Hindu extremist groups receive some of their funds from charities in the United States and the United Kingdom. In 2003, the Commission on International Religious Freedom of the United States State Department recommended that India be designated a Country of Particular Concern (CPC). Although this recommendation was rejected by Secretary of State Colin Powell,[75] the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom's annual reports continue to reflect concern over the abuses of the Sangh,76 and again recommended that India be named a CPC in 2004.

Gujarat: Hindutva Politics and Narendra Modi

Gujarat: Hindutva Politics and Narendra Modi


http://www.merinews.com/upload/thumbimage/1221900522948_narendra-modi-big_t.jpg

According to the concerned Citizens Tribunal, the Sangh Parivar undertook a series of preparatory actions in Gujarat prior to 2002.66 Keshubhai Patel came to power as the BJP Chief Minister in 1998. As early as January 02, 1999, Gujarat was identified as a "Hindutva laboratary" as reported by Harish Khare, who argued that the anti-Christian violence of 1999 was indeed organized and carried out by the VHP and the Hindu Jagran Manch (a VHP front organization), contrary to the conclusions of another fact-finding team led by M. B. Kaushal. Khare called attention to the infiltration of the Sangh into the police force, pointing to the transfer of the District Superintendent for registering a complaint against Bajrang Dal members, and the fact that the police force's "lower level postings throughout the state have been allowed by the Keshubhai Patel Government to be vetted by the local Bajrang Dal-VHP functionaries."[67]

On February 14, 1999, a Sangh-controlled "religious parliament," organized by the VHP in Ahmedabad, the city where some of the most extreme anti-Muslim violence took place in 2002, declared "Christianity and Islam as alien religions and therefore against Indian ethos."[68] On February 16, 1999, progressive organizations in Gujarat strongly protested against the Government of Gujarat's census of Christians and Muslims in the state. The census of these religious minority populations included an inventory of telephone numbers and vehicle information, their links with foreign countries and their police records.[69]

The Gujarat Civil Servants Conduct Rules of 1971 prohibits government employees from participating in the activities of certain organizations, which included the RSS and the VHP. On January 04, 2000, then Gujarat Chief Minister Keshubhai Patel, with the support of the BJP national government, unlisted the RSS from this ban, authorizing state government employees to participate in the activities of this organization.[70] In late January 2001, a severe earthquake devastated Gujarat. Various charitable organizations raised money for relief work. Sangh organizations raised substantial funds from abroad[71] for the Gujarat earthquake, and discriminated against religious minorities and lower-caste people in the distribution of the aid.[72]

Between February and April of 2002, incendiary pamphlets were distributed, ranging from encouraging people to participate in anti-constitutional boycotts of Muslim shops and establishments to "exhortations to violence against Muslim women and children that are too shocking to detail." Though most of the circulars were anonymous, the "VHP and Bajrang Dal claimed proud ownership of at least four."[73]

Narendra Modi came to power as the Chief Minister of Gujarat on October 07, 2001. Following the violence of early 2002, Modi embarked on a Gaurav Yatra, or ‘Pride Procession’, to begin a campaign for his re-election. His platform was ‘Gujarati Pride’, and many regarded the Yatra as a celebration of the success of the Sangh in his state. Modi was re-elected as Chief Minister in December 2002.

The BJP-led coalition of political parties at the national level faced defeat in 2004. Although the BJP lost its position as the head of the governing coalition in 2004, it still governs in several states, including Gujarat, where Narendra Modi remains in power, Arunachal Pradesh, Goa, Karnataka, Uttaranchal, Chhatisgarh, and Orissa. Narendra Modi’s actions in Gujarat have compelled other Hindutva ideologues such as Praveen Togadia, International Secretary of the VHP, to issue a call seeking to bring "Ram Rajya" (rule of Ram, an energizing myth in the discourse of Hindu nation) to other states, such as Orissa.[74] The Sangh's social and cultural organizations continue their work at the local level and infiltrate into institutional structures, continuing to undermine and target cultural, political and religious minorities.

Prevention of Terrorism Act

Prevention of Terrorism Act


http://www.timescontent.com/tss/photos/preview/172831/Narendra%20Modi.jpg

The Government of India introduced the Prevention of Terrorism Ordinance on October 15, 2001, empowering the state to detain political opponents, revoke civil liberties, and suppress actions it deems threatening to the nation. On March 26, 2002, POTA was enacted into law. The People's Tribunal on POTA, held in New Delhi in March 2003, describes the use of the Act to target minorities, especially Muslims.[62]

In Gujarat, after 2002, 240 people were held under POTA, 239 Muslims and one person from the Sikh community.[63] Modi’s government has not released any of these POTA detainees[64] while the Parliament of India repealed POTA in December 2004, even as the repeal is not retrospective.[65] This clearly indicates the use of law to target minority communities, fostering division, hatred and violence in Gujarat.